![]() ![]() Janet Campbell) decides that a conversation needs to be privileged, in which case privileged conversations may take place via email or phone call. The only exception would be where the Foundation's counsel (e.g. ALL interactions regarding the CQ would then take place via IPzilla. All of the content of the initial CQ would be included as the initial definition of the bug. In the email response sent to the creator the IPzilla number with a link would be included. When a CQ is created, the revised script would create an IPzilla entry. The expectation is that people would add themselves to the cc list for CQs that they are interested in.įor the sake of consistency and to avoid bogus CQ's, access to the CQ form would also be moved to the Committer Tools page. Logging into IPzilla would require a committer userid and password as well. In other words, IPzilla would not be public, and a committer userid and password would be required for access. This would be a separate Bugzilla instance ("IPzilla") which would be reachable by all committers via the " Committer Tools" page. We would like to propose that we use Bugzilla as the primary mechanism for fostering the visibility and dialogue around the CQs. It also must be recognized that IP due diligence requires some discretion due to the legalistic nature of the conversations and the sensitivity of the topics being discussed. discover what third-party components have been previously reviewed and approved by the EMO.track the status of their contribution questionnaires (CQs) and.There is a strong desire to make it simpler and easier for committers to do two things: This is a proposal for providing committer access to the status on their contribution questionnaires. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |